Search for: All records

Surface topography represents a critical barrier to the advancement of additive manufacturing (AM). Because some internal features cannot be polished and because of the growing trend of in situ process monitoring, it is important to understand the as-built surface topography of AM components. Here we highlight the challenges of using industry-standard surface-measurement techniques on binder-jet-printed parts. We measured the topography of binder-jet-printed Inconel alloy 625 samples in their green state and over the course of sintering; this system allowed the investigation of identical starting materials undergoing systematic changes in topography. Specifically, we compared the results from industry-standard surface-measurement techniques—optical interferometry, 3D microscopy (by fringe projection), and stylus profilometry—against the “true topography,” as revealed by cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy. While the true topography changed significantly with sintering, the industry-standard techniques detected no change in the root-mean-square height because of complex surface features, including multi-scale topography, overhangs, and steep surface slopes. While these findings do not invalidate the use of industry-standard techniques for binder-jet-printed samples, they demonstrate a challenge in their application, and they motivate the development of new metrics and new techniques to more accurately describe surface topography in AM. 

While controlling underwater adhesion is critical for designing biological adhesives and in improving the traction of tires, haptics, or adhesives for health monitoring devices, it is hindered by a lack of fundamental understanding of how the presence of trapped water impedes interfacial bonding. Here, by using well-characterized polycrystal diamond surfaces and soft, nonhysteretic, low–surface energy elastomers, we show a reduction in adhesion during approach and four times higher adhesion during retraction as compared to the thermodynamic work of adhesion. Our findings reveal how the loading phase of contact is governed by the entrapment of water by ultrasmall (10-nanometer-scale) surface features. In contrast, the same nanofeatures that reduce adhesion during approach serve to increase adhesion during separation. The explanation for this counterintuitive result lies in the incompressibility-inextensibility of trapped water and the work needed to deform the polymer around water pockets. Unlike the well-known viscoelastic contribution to adhesion, this science unlocks strategies for tailoring surface topography to enhance underwater adhesion.